Edward Middleton wrote:
Mike Jackson wrote:


Michael Bell wrote:


Hi Oli,


GPL means, every modification you make to the code must go back to
the project.



This is my idea of GPL too.


The GPL certainly allows people to make modifications to code without
contributing it back to the project.


for a relevant quote from GPL FAQ

http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#DevelopChangesUnderNDA

the important point being. "The GPL would give the client the right to
redistribute your version."

I'm not a specialist for licenses, so does this be the background of what FSF understand as copyleft?

Second question, can we simply define that the writing and integration of OpenCA::Commands is intended use (like Linux does it with the system calls)?

Michael
--
_______________________________________________________________

Michael Bell                    Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin

Tel.: +49 (0)30-2093 2482       ZE Computer- und Medienservice
Fax:  +49 (0)30-2093 2704       Unter den Linden 6
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   D-10099 Berlin
_______________________________________________________________

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to