Michael Bell wrote:

> Hi Sergei,
>
> Sergei Vyshenski wrote:
>
>> Afraid I can not. As this could upset several of the core, which is
>> the point I would rather escape.
>> Sorry.
>
>
> This is part of an open discussion - I mean the conflict not the ... ;)
>
>> Nonetheless, having a board like in a private club or lodge may be
>> superior and more predictable compared to democracy games.
>
>
> Ok, if I interpret the discussion until here correctly then we need
> perhaps something like a three class system - board members, active
> developers and normal users. So we would have a democracy of peoples
> who are qualified by technical expertise. Does this be safe enough?
>
> The following things must be discussed. So please take them as proposals:
>
> 1. Board members must/should be active developers.
>
> If we want that the active developers elect the board then we must
> define who are active developers.

The reason for making board members active developers is to avoid a
split between the board and the developers.  The risk of having a board
made completely of developers is that user issues my end up being
ignored.  What about having the majority of board members limited to
developers and having a minority of members selected with a more "open
democratic process".

> 2.1. A person is an active developer if he contributes code in the
> last 1/2/3 years which moved into the official source code revision
> system.
>
> 2.2. A person is an active developer if he contributes documentation
> in the last 1/2/3 years (perhaps we should define a volume here).
>
> Please take this like usual as a first, fast and usually erroneous
> approach. So who has better definitions?
>
> Michael



-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
_______________________________________________
OpenCA-Devel mailing list
OpenCA-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openca-devel

Reply via email to