In a message dated 7/17/99 10:43:36 AM, you wrote: <<Actually, I agree that there is room for improvement in the syntax. The record fields are a bit of a hack IMO, and things like "[email protected][4]", although I became accustomed to it, aren't very xTalk-ish. Perhaps something like "boolean 4 of pointer myPointer" would do the trick? As for types, I'm wishy-washy about what more could be done. I don't think I want a heavily typed xTalk, and CompileIt! did let you influence what types were used internally. But maybe it should support better typing when you really want, say, a "float" that works like a float. >> I prefer Put boolean 4 at pointer myPointer.
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question Yennie
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question Yennie
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question Yennie
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question Yennie
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question DeRobertis
- Re: Re: OODL: Goofball OT question MP0werd
- Re: Re: OODL: Goofball OT question M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: Re: OODL: Goofball OT question DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question Yennie
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question Yennie
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question Yennie
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question DeRobertis
