At 1:19 AM -0400 on 7/17/99, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ><<I'd advise you that any code converted to one language to another (e.g., >HyperTalk -> C++) will _not_ be pretty or elegant. > >I'd suggest a real compiler -- something I might do someday. Anyone >interested in egcs 1.1.1 Macintosh?>> > >I agree wholeheartedly: xTalk-> C++ would undoubtedly create some real >horrors. So until I am up for writing the whole thing compiler and all, it >will remain a pipedream. Anyone know of any source out there for a simple >compiler? I can handle interpreters, but the compiling scares me away. If you can manage to conver OpenTalk to a tokenized form, you should be able to feed it to the egcs backend. Try <http://egcs.cygnus.com/> for more info.
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question Michael Fair
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question Yennie
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question Yennie
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question Yennie
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question Yennie
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question Yennie
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question Yennie
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question DeRobertis
- Re: Re: OODL: Goofball OT question MP0werd
