>>Indecisiveness will get us nowhere.
>
>Right, Anthony; so people who are indecisive about voting should understand
>that it is one of the obligations of partnership. By making this clear
>now, we not only settle the name issue but also take the first step in
>settling the issue of who will be partners.
>
>Or do you disagree that voting should be a responsibility of partnership?
Well, I am the problem with this rule. I was away when the vote was
retaken (moving actually) and wasn't expecting to be back until February
but by the courtesy of my university I have manged to be back, however I
have missed the second round of voting. I have no problems with FreeCard
and will endorse it as the name of our product, I also like FreeScript.
I would hate to think that my absense for a couple of weeks means that I
cannot become a partner, besides, I really don't care what the name is
almost all of the names suggested would have been fine by me. I think
all we can do is make the amount someone votes one of the things to be
taken into consideration when applying for or reviewing membership. I
would not make it a prerequisite, but it is expected.
That's my two cents anyway.
>Rob Cozens, CCW
Adrian Sutton.
