At 9:07 AM -0700 on 12/11/99, Rob Cozens wrote: >And I do believe a partner has a >responsibility to vote unless circumstances make it impossible to do so. Fine. As long as 'present' is an option on all votes. Otherwise, your forcing someone to vote -- even if he feels he does not know the subject well enough to make an informed decision.
- Re: OODL: Names, and voting as prerequisite to partnership Rob Cozens
- Re: OODL: Names, and voting as prerequisite to partne... M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Names, and voting as prerequisite to pa... Rob Cozens
- Re: OODL: Names, and voting as prerequisite t... M. Uli Kusterer
- OODL: Names, and voting as prerequisite to partnership Paul Sutton
- Re: OODL: Names, and voting as prerequisite to partne... M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Names, and voting as prerequisite to partnership Paul Sutton
- OODL: Names, and voting as prerequisite to partnership Alain Farmer
- Re: OODL: Names, and voting as prerequisite to partne... Rob Cozens
- Re: OODL: Names, and voting as prerequisite to partne... M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: Re: OODL: Names, and voting as prerequisite to partne... MP0werd
