Re: OODL: Names, and voting as prerequisite to partnership

[DeRobertis]

At 7:04 AM -0700 on 12/13/99, Rob Cozens wrote:
>>>And I do believe a partner has a
>>>responsibility to vote unless circumstances make it impossible to do so.
>>
>>Fine. As long as 'present' is an option on all votes.
>
>We're on the same page, Anthony: your "present" is my "abstain".

I think "present" is a little better, because then it can be counted
towards quorum and to show that people actually did hear about the vote.