Arghhhh. That's absurd on so many different levels. I don't even know where
to begin. Jeff, I hope that you're trying to be funny or provocative, and
not serious...

--linas

On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 8:53 AM Jeff Thompson <[email protected]> wrote:

> If you keep showing the ovlbviously fake chatbot vaudville show of Sophia
> as the demonstration of Atomspace technology, then what do.you expect?
>
> On Mon, Nov 5, 2018, 12:20 Roman Treutlein <[email protected] wrote:
>
>> I think if we want to increase the user-base for the AtomSpace we need to
>> market it more/differently. I just tried to find the Atomspace by googling
>> combinations of {graph,hypergrah, databse,comparison,...} and I can't.
>> Googling "atomspace graph database" only has 4000 results whereas "neo4j
>> graph database" has 466000 results. So it doesn't really matter how
>> advanced the Atomspace is if nobody can find it.
>>
>> And I don't think adding more features like a Tinkerpop like API will
>> help in that regard. So far we are a bunch of software engineers working on
>> the Atomspace so we can use it for OpenCog and I don't know of anybody that
>> uses the AtomSpace outside of OpenCog. So to get more user we would need
>> people that work on and try to push/sell the Atomspace as an
>> independent product with its own Website and stuff. No idea who would/could
>> do something like that. But this is my opinion on the topic.
>>
>> On Sunday, November 4, 2018 at 12:02:52 AM UTC+1, linas wrote:
>>>
>>> So:
>>> Here's a quick, unstructured, randomized review of TinkerPop vs. the
>>> AtomSpace.
>>>
>>> * There are many similarities.  For example, both tinkerpop and the
>>> atomspace have a key-value store per vertex/edge.  Tinkerpop edges have
>>> valency-2 (one vertex at each end of the edge) and are untyped. Atomspace
>>> edges have any valency and are typed. (an atomspace edge aka link, can have
>>> two vertexes in it .. or 1 or 3 or 0 or 23... also, a link can contain
>>> links. The atomspace stores hypergraphs.)
>>>
>>> * Tinkerpop4, when it's available, will be hostable by "any" suitable
>>> database platform.  The AtomSpace has already played in this area: an
>>> unsuccessful hosting on memcachedb, a successful hosting on postgres, an
>>> unsuccessful one on hypertable, an unsuccessful one on neo4j.  The failure
>>> reasons are highly variable: memcachedb was too slow. The hypertable
>>> developer fundamentally misunderstood the problem.  neo4j was too slow (had
>>> too large a communications overhead).
>>>
>>> * Both the atomspace and tinkerpop4 benefit from underlying DB
>>> technology: Postgres is highly scalable, yay! Someday, Atomspace will have
>>> an Apache Ignite backend, which is also highly scalable. Yay!
>>>
>>> * Tinkerpop has a MUCH larger development community than the AtomSpace.
>>> Which means that they've done stuff long ago that are still in planning
>>> stages for us. For example, "the property graph model", which the Atomspace
>>> needs but doesn't have (We have real customers for this: the AGI-BIO guys
>>> want this!  No one is working on it!)  (So, for example, key-value pairs
>>> are permission-based; AGI-bio wants to overload values, based on the
>>> permissions that a given user has, so e.g. there is a read-only version of
>>> genomic data, and multiple read-write layers on top of it, that different
>>> researchers update. Someone needs to work on this!)
>>>
>>> * The Gremlin traversal language is almost exactly like a an atomspace
>>> pattern with a single clause. There is no concept of a multi-clause
>>> traversal in Gremlin.
>>>
>>> After this, the differences between the two compound and diverge.
>>>
>>> * The Gremlin traversal language can be compiled to bytecode, and
>>> shipped off to be executed remotely. Could we do something similar? Yeah, I
>>> guess. But its never been the goal of the atomspace to be a generic wrapper
>>> on top of existing OLAP/OLTP systems, so we've never given this much
>>> thought.
>>>
>>> My biggest question/frustration:
>>>
>>> How can we increase the user-base for the AtomSpace? It's kind of
>>> frustrating that the adoption rate for the AtomSpace remains low, even as
>>> graph databases become ever more popular.  It feels like we're getting left
>>> in the dust, and yet, whenever I look around, it feels like we're two steps
>>> ahead of everyone else. So I can't figure out if we're winning or loosing.
>>> Increasing adoption would really really help...
>>>
>>> -- Linas
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 3:20 PM Amirouche Boubekki <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> https://zenodo.org/record/1476234/files/forth-kind.pdf?download=1
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "opencog" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/opencog.
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/09200c55-4f0d-4197-8835-a21859a11442%40googlegroups.com
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/09200c55-4f0d-4197-8835-a21859a11442%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> cassette tapes - analog TV - film cameras - you
>>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "opencog" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/opencog.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/752eeee7-eadf-4bc3-926a-bff1ba5860e1%40googlegroups.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/752eeee7-eadf-4bc3-926a-bff1ba5860e1%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "opencog" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/opencog.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/CACOF_x%3D6D-H2NgAkZmNddGzchtZDB4g7WN18SNMMo_LB7Ug3EQ%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/CACOF_x%3D6D-H2NgAkZmNddGzchtZDB4g7WN18SNMMo_LB7Ug3EQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>


-- 
cassette tapes - analog TV - film cameras - you

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"opencog" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/opencog.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/CAHrUA37e0AZ7pU7v8%2B3FswvddUSK%2BZrjM%2B_ZgZvkfgoWL5ZLLA%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to