On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 9:14 AM Johannes Castner <[email protected]> wrote:
> PS: > > Here's a list of obo defined properties on relationships: > https://metacpan.org/pod/OBO::Core::RelationshipType#is_cyclic > Each relationship could be encoded in these ways in the AtomSpace > correct? > > I'm not sure I can add anything useful or meaningful here, other than to say "Yayy!" and "good job!" Designing a good format for representing relationships is ... hard. Typically, you have a bunch of different ways you can do it, but its hard to say which is better till you try a few. So try a bunch of different prototypes, and see what works. Some day (in the distant future!?) when you think you know of really good ways of doing relationships, it should be boiled down to a couple of examples. Ideally something that is so short and simple, we could stick it into the examples folder.... (like the ones here: https://github.com/opencog/atomspace/tree/master/examples) I'd be interested in seeing what they look like --linas -- cassette tapes - analog TV - film cameras - you -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "opencog" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/opencog. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/CAHrUA34g5iKshYThZuoLM8BosAKyUzxtmhNAcHT9JATitJ4NOg%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
