Hi Nil,

If I can help you with that I would love to!  I'm trying to put that third
chapter of my dissertation together and anything that pushes the envelop a
bit further is always better!

Johannes

On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 9:10 AM 'Nil Geisweiller' via opencog <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Johannes,
>
> I'm in the debugging phase of porting Shujing's I-surprisingness code
> https://wiki.opencog.org/w/Measuring_Surprisingness to the new pattern
> miner (struggling against what seems to be a pattern matcher bug ATM).
>
> In parallel I'm reviewing the literature on surprisingness and writing a
> document to go beyond that code. It seems surprisingness is not only
> relative to the knowledge available but also to how someone "thinks"
> about something. So far I have come to the conclusion that, in its most
> abstract form, surprisingness is merely the distance between the
> outcomes of 2 inferences, and all specializations of surprisingness can
> be derived from that abstraction. We'll see how that goes.
>
> Porting Shujing's code will be for sure ready within 2 weeks. Going
> beyond that code is gonna take a lot more time as it is research.
>
> Nil
>
> On 2/4/19 10:33 AM, Johannes Castner wrote:
> > Hi Nil,
> >
> > Fascinating indeed!
> >
> > What is the status of the pattern miner and the interestingness
> > measure?  I'm not asking because I'm in a rush (I still have about two
> > weeks before I'm ready), before I can use it for my dissertation paper,
> > I still have work to do with respect to the AtomSpace representation of
> > the ontologies and also with auto-scaling of my system's memory so that
> > I can load in the Gazetteer, which is huge.  I think that in about two
> > weeks, I'd like to give that interesting pattern mininer a spin on the
> > AtomSpace filled with two ontologies along with a huge, global
> > gazetteer, if I can.  Gdelt might also be an interesting source of
> > knowledge to learn new things about Sustainable Development from
> > (https://www.gdeltproject.org/).  In the meantime, I'm working on
> > encoding as much about those relationships as there is information for
> > in the ontology: if a relationship is transitive, symmetric, etc. I want
> > to at least encode that in addition to the Evaluation PredicateNode
> > construct, which I understand, but I think that coding more of the
> > correct structure will help to gain better insight. In the medium term,
> > I'd be interested in seeing if the full social-cultural-institutional
> > meaning of particular types of relations (what do they predict, etc.)
> > could emerge from intense online interactions between people and the
> > AtomSpace.  That is what I'm working towards academically, while trying
> > to make use of it for business so that I can finance the operation.
> >
> > Johannes
> >
> >
> > On Sunday, February 3, 2019 at 6:11:24 AM UTC, Nil wrote:
> >
> >     On 2/2/19 6:26 PM, Johannes Castner wrote:
> >      > Let me ask you this: how much of the work in this book has been
> >      > implemented as part of opencog, thus far:
> >      > https://link.springer.com/book/10.2991/978-94-91216-11-4
> >     <https://link.springer.com/book/10.2991/978-94-91216-11-4>
> >
> >     If you're talking about part III of the book, not much. However PLN
> >     relies now on a much more powerful tool, the URE. At the time of
> >     writing
> >     the book, PLN was hard-coded in C++ and somewhat inflexible.
> >
> >     Back then it had
> >     - Extensional and intensional reasoning
> >     - A bit of contextual reasoning
> >     - Maybe some embryonic causal/spatio/temporal reasoning
> >     - No dynamic control mechanism
> >
> >     The new PLN has
> >     - Extensional reasoning
> >     - No/broken intensional reasoning
> >     - No/broken contextual reasoning
> >     - No causal/spatio-temporal reasoning
> >     - Dynamic control mechanism, capable of meta-learning. :-)
> >
> >     What we have gained is that OpenCog is able to learn how to control
> its
> >     own reasoning and even rewrite its own reasoning rules. The
> counterpart
> >     is that we still need to port intensional, contextual, causal and
> >     spatio-temporal reasoning.
> >
> >     If you're interested, there is an example of control meta-learning
> >
> >
> https://github.com/opencog/opencog/tree/master/examples/pln/inference-control-learning
> >     <
> https://github.com/opencog/opencog/tree/master/examples/pln/inference-control-learning
> >
> >
> >
> >     Nil
> >
> >      > Is the work on this set of ideas dead in the water or is this
> >     actively
> >      > pursued and lastly, may we help with it?  We're definitely eager
> >     to help
> >      > where we can, as we're trying to build on these ideas.
> >      >
> >      > Johannes
> >      >
> >      >
> >      > On Saturday, February 2, 2019 at 3:09:54 PM UTC, linas wrote:
> >      >
> >      >
> >      >
> >      >     On Sat, Feb 2, 2019 at 4:03 AM 'Nil Geisweiller' via opencog
> >      >     <[email protected] <javascript:>> wrote:
> >      >
> >      >
> >      >         I'm longing to go back to spatio-temporal reasoning but
> >     I'm involved
> >      >         with other matters.
> >      >
> >      >         Linas, Amen? Any idea of how this is going?
> >      >
> >      >
> >      >     Seems to be dead in the water.  Anyway, all that I was
> >     plumping for
> >      >     was not really "reasoning" but just simple predicates that
> >     converted
> >      >     tow 3D points into "in front of", "behind", "next to" and if
> >     the 3D
> >      >     points arrived at different times, "before", "after", just so
> >     that
> >      >     natural language would get access to the 3D info. That's all;
> >     its
> >      >     pretty minimal.
> >      >
> >      >     Perhaps relevant for Johannes is the "electrical part of"
> demo,
> >      >     which shows how to convert a Concept into a Predicate  (and
> >     how to
> >      >     build complex relations out of simple ones)
> >      >
> >      > https://wiki.opencog.org/w/EquivalenceLink
> >     <https://wiki.opencog.org/w/EquivalenceLink>
> >      >     <https://wiki.opencog.org/w/EquivalenceLink
> >     <https://wiki.opencog.org/w/EquivalenceLink>>
> >      >
> >      >     -- linas
> >      >     --
> >      >     cassette tapes - analog TV - film cameras - you
> >      >
> >      > --
> >      > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> >      > Groups "opencog" group.
> >      > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
> >     send
> >      > an email to [email protected] <javascript:>
> >      > <mailto:[email protected] <javascript:>>.
> >      > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> >     <javascript:>
> >      > <mailto:[email protected] <javascript:>>.
> >      > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/opencog
> >     <https://groups.google.com/group/opencog>.
> >      > To view this discussion on the web visit
> >      >
> >
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/479c8040-a764-410d-b3f8-acb9967b357b%40googlegroups.com
> >     <
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/479c8040-a764-410d-b3f8-acb9967b357b%40googlegroups.com
> >
> >
> >      >
> >     <
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/479c8040-a764-410d-b3f8-acb9967b357b%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer
> >     <
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/479c8040-a764-410d-b3f8-acb9967b357b%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer
> >>.
> >
> >      > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout
> >     <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > Groups "opencog" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> > an email to [email protected]
> > <mailto:[email protected]>.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> > <mailto:[email protected]>.
> > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/opencog.
> > To view this discussion on the web visit
> >
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/9f7b0614-8f4e-424f-8db8-5f1e45659cf9%40googlegroups.com
> > <
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/9f7b0614-8f4e-424f-8db8-5f1e45659cf9%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer
> >.
> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "opencog" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/opencog.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/e166952f-2e3b-6c33-18b8-e920d1c964cf%40gmail.com
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>


-- 
Johannes

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Peace cannot be kept by force; it can only be achieved by understanding."

- Albert Einstein

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"opencog" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/opencog.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/CABZZiPLHJMrzaDxCui-M4cR1jTn0XgAAJbk6tKJX7-4JnXCjVw%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to