Thank you, Linas! Let me ask you this: how much of the work in this book has been implemented as part of opencog, thus far: https://link.springer.com/book/10.2991/978-94-91216-11-4
Is the work on this set of ideas dead in the water or is this actively pursued and lastly, may we help with it? We're definitely eager to help where we can, as we're trying to build on these ideas. Johannes On Saturday, February 2, 2019 at 3:09:54 PM UTC, linas wrote: > > > > On Sat, Feb 2, 2019 at 4:03 AM 'Nil Geisweiller' via opencog < > [email protected] <javascript:>> wrote: > >> >> I'm longing to go back to spatio-temporal reasoning but I'm involved >> with other matters. >> >> Linas, Amen? Any idea of how this is going? >> >> > Seems to be dead in the water. Anyway, all that I was plumping for was > not really "reasoning" but just simple predicates that converted tow 3D > points into "in front of", "behind", "next to" and if the 3D points arrived > at different times, "before", "after", just so that natural language would > get access to the 3D info. That's all; its pretty minimal. > > Perhaps relevant for Johannes is the "electrical part of" demo, which > shows how to convert a Concept into a Predicate (and how to build complex > relations out of simple ones) > > https://wiki.opencog.org/w/EquivalenceLink > > -- linas > -- > cassette tapes - analog TV - film cameras - you > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "opencog" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/opencog. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/479c8040-a764-410d-b3f8-acb9967b357b%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
