On 2/4/19 3:48 PM, Johannes Castner wrote:
If I can help you with that I would love to!  I'm trying to put that third chapter of my dissertation together and anything that pushes the envelop a bit further is always better!

Sure, I'll keep you informed of my progress, any help is welcome!

Nil

Johannes

On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 9:10 AM 'Nil Geisweiller' via opencog <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Hi Johannes,

    I'm in the debugging phase of porting Shujing's I-surprisingness code
    https://wiki.opencog.org/w/Measuring_Surprisingness to the new pattern
    miner (struggling against what seems to be a pattern matcher bug ATM).

    In parallel I'm reviewing the literature on surprisingness and
    writing a
    document to go beyond that code. It seems surprisingness is not only
    relative to the knowledge available but also to how someone "thinks"
    about something. So far I have come to the conclusion that, in its most
    abstract form, surprisingness is merely the distance between the
    outcomes of 2 inferences, and all specializations of surprisingness can
    be derived from that abstraction. We'll see how that goes.

    Porting Shujing's code will be for sure ready within 2 weeks. Going
    beyond that code is gonna take a lot more time as it is research.

    Nil

    On 2/4/19 10:33 AM, Johannes Castner wrote:
     > Hi Nil,
     >
     > Fascinating indeed!
     >
     > What is the status of the pattern miner and the interestingness
     > measure?  I'm not asking because I'm in a rush (I still have
    about two
     > weeks before I'm ready), before I can use it for my dissertation
    paper,
     > I still have work to do with respect to the AtomSpace
    representation of
     > the ontologies and also with auto-scaling of my system's memory
    so that
     > I can load in the Gazetteer, which is huge.  I think that in
    about two
     > weeks, I'd like to give that interesting pattern mininer a spin
    on the
     > AtomSpace filled with two ontologies along with a huge, global
     > gazetteer, if I can.  Gdelt might also be an interesting source of
     > knowledge to learn new things about Sustainable Development from
     > (https://www.gdeltproject.org/).  In the meantime, I'm working on
     > encoding as much about those relationships as there is
    information for
     > in the ontology: if a relationship is transitive, symmetric, etc.
    I want
     > to at least encode that in addition to the Evaluation PredicateNode
     > construct, which I understand, but I think that coding more of the
     > correct structure will help to gain better insight. In the medium
    term,
     > I'd be interested in seeing if the full
    social-cultural-institutional
     > meaning of particular types of relations (what do they predict,
    etc.)
     > could emerge from intense online interactions between people and the
     > AtomSpace.  That is what I'm working towards academically, while
    trying
     > to make use of it for business so that I can finance the operation.
     >
     > Johannes
     >
     >
     > On Sunday, February 3, 2019 at 6:11:24 AM UTC, Nil wrote:
     >
     >     On 2/2/19 6:26 PM, Johannes Castner wrote:
     >      > Let me ask you this: how much of the work in this book has
    been
     >      > implemented as part of opencog, thus far:
     >      > https://link.springer.com/book/10.2991/978-94-91216-11-4
     >     <https://link.springer.com/book/10.2991/978-94-91216-11-4>
     >
     >     If you're talking about part III of the book, not much.
    However PLN
     >     relies now on a much more powerful tool, the URE. At the time of
     >     writing
     >     the book, PLN was hard-coded in C++ and somewhat inflexible.
     >
     >     Back then it had
     >     - Extensional and intensional reasoning
     >     - A bit of contextual reasoning
     >     - Maybe some embryonic causal/spatio/temporal reasoning
     >     - No dynamic control mechanism
     >
     >     The new PLN has
     >     - Extensional reasoning
     >     - No/broken intensional reasoning
     >     - No/broken contextual reasoning
     >     - No causal/spatio-temporal reasoning
     >     - Dynamic control mechanism, capable of meta-learning. :-)
     >
     >     What we have gained is that OpenCog is able to learn how to
    control its
     >     own reasoning and even rewrite its own reasoning rules. The
    counterpart
     >     is that we still need to port intensional, contextual, causal and
     >     spatio-temporal reasoning.
     >
     >     If you're interested, there is an example of control
    meta-learning
     >
     >
    
https://github.com/opencog/opencog/tree/master/examples/pln/inference-control-learning
>  <https://github.com/opencog/opencog/tree/master/examples/pln/inference-control-learning>
     >
     >
     >     Nil
     >
     >      > Is the work on this set of ideas dead in the water or is this
     >     actively
     >      > pursued and lastly, may we help with it?  We're definitely
    eager
     >     to help
     >      > where we can, as we're trying to build on these ideas.
     >      >
     >      > Johannes
     >      >
     >      >
     >      > On Saturday, February 2, 2019 at 3:09:54 PM UTC, linas wrote:
     >      >
     >      >
     >      >
     >      >     On Sat, Feb 2, 2019 at 4:03 AM 'Nil Geisweiller' via
    opencog
     >      >     <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]> <javascript:>> wrote:
     >      >
     >      >
     >      >         I'm longing to go back to spatio-temporal
    reasoning but
     >     I'm involved
     >      >         with other matters.
     >      >
     >      >         Linas, Amen? Any idea of how this is going?
     >      >
     >      >
     >      >     Seems to be dead in the water.  Anyway, all that I was
     >     plumping for
     >      >     was not really "reasoning" but just simple predicates that
     >     converted
     >      >     tow 3D points into "in front of", "behind", "next to"
    and if
     >     the 3D
     >      >     points arrived at different times, "before", "after",
    just so
     >     that
     >      >     natural language would get access to the 3D info.
    That's all;
     >     its
     >      >     pretty minimal.
     >      >
     >      >     Perhaps relevant for Johannes is the "electrical part
    of" demo,
>      >     which shows how to convert a Concept into a Predicate (and
     >     how to
     >      >     build complex relations out of simple ones)
     >      >
     >      > https://wiki.opencog.org/w/EquivalenceLink
     >     <https://wiki.opencog.org/w/EquivalenceLink>
     >      >     <https://wiki.opencog.org/w/EquivalenceLink
     >     <https://wiki.opencog.org/w/EquivalenceLink>>
     >      >
     >      >     -- linas
     >      >     --
     >      >     cassette tapes - analog TV - film cameras - you
     >      >
     >      > --
     >      > You received this message because you are subscribed to
    the Google
     >      > Groups "opencog" group.
     >      > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails
    from it,
     >     send
     >      > an email to [email protected]
    <mailto:opencog%[email protected]> <javascript:>
     >      > <mailto:[email protected]
    <mailto:opencog%[email protected]> <javascript:>>.
     >      > To post to this group, send email to
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
     >     <javascript:>
     >      > <mailto:[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]> <javascript:>>.
     >      > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/opencog
     >     <https://groups.google.com/group/opencog>.
     >      > To view this discussion on the web visit
     >      >
     >
    
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/479c8040-a764-410d-b3f8-acb9967b357b%40googlegroups.com
>  <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/479c8040-a764-410d-b3f8-acb9967b357b%40googlegroups.com>
     >
     >      >
>  <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/479c8040-a764-410d-b3f8-acb9967b357b%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer >  <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/479c8040-a764-410d-b3f8-acb9967b357b%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>>.
     >
     >      > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout
     >     <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.
     >
     > --
     > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
     > Groups "opencog" group.
     > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
    send
     > an email to [email protected]
    <mailto:opencog%[email protected]>
     > <mailto:[email protected]
    <mailto:opencog%[email protected]>>.
     > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
     > <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>.
     > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/opencog.
     > To view this discussion on the web visit
     >
    
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/9f7b0614-8f4e-424f-8db8-5f1e45659cf9%40googlegroups.com

     >
    
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/9f7b0614-8f4e-424f-8db8-5f1e45659cf9%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
     > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
    Groups "opencog" group.
    To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
    send an email to [email protected]
    <mailto:opencog%[email protected]>.
    To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>.
    Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/opencog.
    To view this discussion on the web visit
    
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/e166952f-2e3b-6c33-18b8-e920d1c964cf%40gmail.com.
    For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



--
Johannes

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Peace cannot be kept by force; it can only be achieved by understanding."

- Albert Einstein

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "opencog" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/opencog.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/CABZZiPLHJMrzaDxCui-M4cR1jTn0XgAAJbk6tKJX7-4JnXCjVw%40mail.gmail.com <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/CABZZiPLHJMrzaDxCui-M4cR1jTn0XgAAJbk6tKJX7-4JnXCjVw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"opencog" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/opencog.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/ecfa378b-c7dc-4bf0-99e4-4e1a5c26cb9b%40gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to