Well yes. What's truly remarkable is how frequently that lesson has to be re-learned. There are vast swaths of the AI industry that still have not learned it, and are deluding themselves into thinking that they've made bold progress, when they've gotten nowhere at all, and seem blithely unaware that they are repeating the same mistake... again.
I refer, of course, to the deep-learning true-believers. They have made the fundamental mistake of thinking that their various network designs provide an adequate representation of reality. How little do they seem to realize that all that code, running hand-tuned on some GPU is just, and I quote Sutton, here: "leveraged human understanding of the special structure of chess". Except, cross out "chess" and replace with "dimensional reduction" or "weight vector" or whatever buzzword-bingo is popular in the deep-learning field these days. I'm back again to insisting that "patterns matter". If you can't spot the pattern, you've not accomplished anything. Neural nets can't spot patterns. They're certainly interesting for various reasons, but, as an AGI technology, they are every bit a dead-end as the hand-crafted English link-grammar dictionary. This is one reason I'm sort of plinking away, working on unfashionable things. I'm thinking simply that they are more generic. and more powerful. But perhaps the problem is recursive: perhaps I'm just "leveraging my human understanding of the special structure of patterns", and will hit a wall someday. For now, it seems that my wall is more distant. If only I could convince others ... --linas On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 5:14 PM Paul McQuesten <[email protected]> wrote: > Linas, > > I think this reinforces your view of learning from data, instead of adding > more human-curated rules: > http://incompleteideas.net/IncIdeas/BitterLesson.html > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "link-grammar" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/link-grammar/464d1f92-00b7-4780-870a-2156229b4567o%40googlegroups.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/link-grammar/464d1f92-00b7-4780-870a-2156229b4567o%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > -- Verbogeny is one of the pleasurettes of a creatific thinkerizer. --Peter da Silva -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "opencog" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/CAHrUA36x8QBXGUg4f9BMw5StdhRu1WFjFr_9ySo_vZesMeZrTA%40mail.gmail.com.
