"If you can't spot the pattern, you've not accomplished anything."

 

Every significant – and truly useful - advance I've made on my own language 
apprehension code has been based on recognizing a pattern, and coding for it.  
I fully agree.

 

Can a neural network be trained on patterns instead of things?

 

Can code designed to recognize – for example, faces (like eigenfaces) – be 
trained to instead recognize blocks of data that look the same, despite perhaps 
being in vastly dissimilar fields?

 

Apologies if I'm intruding, or seem to be "out of my lane"… a popular buzzword 
these days.

 

Dave – LONG time lurker…

 

 

 

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Linas 
Vepstas
Sent: Saturday, July 18, 2020 6:54 PM
To: link-grammar <[email protected]>; opencog 
<[email protected]>
Subject: [opencog-dev] Re: [Link Grammar] Sutton's bitter lesson

 

Well yes. What's truly remarkable is how frequently that lesson has to be 
re-learned.  There are vast swaths of the AI industry that still have not 
learned it, and are deluding themselves into thinking that they've made bold 
progress, when they've gotten nowhere at all, and seem blithely unaware that 
they are repeating the same mistake... again.

 

I refer, of course, to the deep-learning true-believers. They have made the 
fundamental mistake of thinking that their various network designs provide an 
adequate representation of reality.  How little do they seem to realize that 
all that code, running hand-tuned on some GPU is just, and I quote Sutton, 
here: "leveraged human understanding of the special structure of chess". 
Except, cross out "chess" and replace with "dimensional reduction" or "weight 
vector" or whatever buzzword-bingo is popular in the deep-learning field these 
days. 

 

I'm back again to insisting that "patterns matter". If you can't spot the 
pattern, you've not accomplished anything. Neural nets can't spot patterns. 
They're certainly interesting for various reasons, but, as an AGI technology, 
they are every bit a dead-end as the hand-crafted English link-grammar 
dictionary.

 

This is one reason I'm sort of plinking away, working on unfashionable things. 
I'm thinking simply that they are more generic. and more powerful.  But perhaps 
the problem is recursive: perhaps I'm just "leveraging my human understanding 
of the special structure of patterns", and will hit a wall someday.  For now, 
it seems that my wall is more distant.  If only I could convince others ...

 

--linas

 

 

On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 5:14 PM Paul McQuesten <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

Linas,

 

I think this reinforces your view of learning from data, instead of adding more 
human-curated rules:

http://incompleteideas.net/IncIdeas/BitterLesson.html

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"link-grammar" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> .
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/link-grammar/464d1f92-00b7-4780-870a-2156229b4567o%40googlegroups.com
 
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/link-grammar/464d1f92-00b7-4780-870a-2156229b4567o%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
 .



-- 

Verbogeny is one of the pleasurettes of a creatific thinkerizer.
        --Peter da Silva

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"opencog" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> .
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/CAHrUA36x8QBXGUg4f9BMw5StdhRu1WFjFr_9ySo_vZesMeZrTA%40mail.gmail.com
 
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/CAHrUA36x8QBXGUg4f9BMw5StdhRu1WFjFr_9ySo_vZesMeZrTA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
 .

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"opencog" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/002701d65d5d%244fdc07d0%24ef941770%24%40xanatos.com.

Reply via email to