Il giorno martedì 23 marzo 2021 alle 15:12:54 UTC+1 Nil ha scritto: > On 3/23/21 1:01 PM, Michele Thiella wrote: > > - In reply to Nil: (on Slack i'm named Raschild) > > I had seen the beginning of the work and it is very interesting. In the > > next few days I will look at the current state. > > Two quick questions: > > 1) How complicated is it to work directly with Ros + Gazebo compared to > > Malmo and Gym? > > I don't know as I've never used Ros or Gazebo. Working with Malmo and > Gym is fairly easy but that's cause they have been designed this way, > and as a result they are fairly limited. For instance the communication > protocol is completely synchronous, it's certainly not something you'd > want to use to control a robot. > > > 2) Are Values already usable instead of OctoMap and SpaceTime server? > > At the current stage ROCCA uses neither values, nor even octomap or > spacetime server. Everything, including spacetime events, lives in the > atomspace, which is extremely inefficient but is not my concern for now. > My concern is to build an agent that makes decisions as rationally as > possible, in unknown and uncertain environments. > > > In conclusion: > > * My master's proposal has already been accepted with the proviso to get > > a feasible project. So, aim for a goal and try to achieve it. If so, > > excellent; if not, show why it failed (I will try to avoid it). > > > > * The direction of the project is still incomplete. Unfortunately, i > > can't figure out if it takes me 1 day, 1 month or 1 year to > > understand/implement a certain code. > > I started with the reasoning: I am currently learning the inference > > rules and how they work with the atomspace, I have seen part of the > > examples in ure and pln and I was trying to understand the blocksworld > > problem developed by Anatoly Belikov here: > > https://github.com/noskill/ure/tree/planning/examples/ure/planning > > > > * Ideally my goal was to extend the "model of the world" to work more > > with objects than people and to extend the "self-model" to execute > > navigation and manipulation plans. In all of this, I haven't yet > > explored the learning. > > Based on what you're saying I think ROCCA would be a good fit. Consider > of course that it is very early stage. I don't mind to semi-mentor you > as long as you're somewhat autonomous (which you seem to be). > > Do you want to have a call (say Friday, as it's ROCCA day for me)? I > could walk you through the code, to help you decide whether you want to > work on it, or else work on Eva. > Nil > > Hi Nill, first of all thank you, it would be a pleasure to have you as a semi-mentor. Until now, I'm autonomous and it seems that it's working for me too. ROCCA is of great interest to me, as I replied to Linas, I realized that my initial idea was a little different, more general and less innovative. Build scaffolding! It may be one direction, but ROCCA may be a better one! A call might be the best solution, as well as a great opportunity for me. My spoken English is not the best, but it will be a way to improve that too. Unfortunately, this week I'm busy with other university things, could it be one of the next Fridays? Meanwhile, I'll try to get a clearer idea of all these news.
Thanks so much again Michele -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "opencog" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/accb1ff9-fb45-492b-b57f-91a77ca9d1fdn%40googlegroups.com.
