Althio it is possible to write the logic to avoid this need, I find it useful at times to express the logic with great than or equal to make it clear what the logic says. The overhead is minbor. I argue for retaining >= and <=.
Ed Hammond
Thomas Beale
<Thomas.Beale at OceanInfor To:
openehr-technical at openehr.org
matics.biz> cc:
Sent by: Subject: Re: Pathology
numeric values not supported in DV_Quantity
owner-openehr-technical@
openehr.org
04/25/2006 05:03 AM
Please respond to
openehr-technical
Heath Frankel wrote:
> Tom,
> Not sure of the need for <= or >=. It's either beyond the value reading
> capability of the device or an actual value is record (within some
accuracy
> tolerance).
>
> Heath
>
>
yes, this has already been mentioned - Vince has never seen it in the
millions of results his software has processed. Vince suggested we put
it in for completeness, but now that you hvae made me think of
it...maybe we should only allow what makes sense, i.e. =, >, <.....with
~ still to be resolved...
- thomas
