Hi Bert
Bert Verhees wrote: > It is not that problem. There is a terminology-interface, below, you > can do whatever you want. Webservices/databases, everything is possible. > > My problem is in the interface itself Which terminology interface are you referring to? Some interface available in the Ocean Editor or the one developed by the Swedish team? > , which seems to me not sufficient, but maybe I misunderstand, that is > why I ask. > > Because the interfaces speak of codes (in codesetaccess and > terminologyaccess), presented in codephrases. I don't know how to > understand this. > How can I present f.e. a description with a code, when only the code > itself is presented in the interface in codephrase-form? > if it was in codedtext, I would be possible to add termmapping which > would be something more, but even in codedtext it is not possible to > add a description. Well the blood pressure archetype uses a "Pressure" code i.e. "125" from the openEHR terminology. However the rubric is not attached as either a description or name anywhere in the archetype model. Is that limitation what you are referring to here? It would be more helpful to explain your problem with the help of an example. However just as a starter, it is quite straight forward to establish a query interface which goes away and extract the rubric assigned to a terminology code to help with the mapping exercise. However this is only for reference purpose. Because once a code has already been assigned to a local term it is "assumed" that the mapping has already been completed for that term. Performing a second round of mapping unless it is with a different terminology is not beneficial. I think what you want to do is perform mapping to other terminologies (which should really be besides the openEHR terminology), in which case you can always present the codes and rubric at the same time to help a person reach a decision on the most appropriate code to map the archetype term to. Which example terminology implementation in the Swedish Archetype Editor have you looked at? Also it is still not clear what exactly you are trying to achieve through the openehr terminology? You might get more responses if you can exemplify your problem statement. Regards Rahil > > So my guess is that there has to be something more. As you can see, I > am confused here. > > Maybe this is not specified on purpose? > > I don't know. > > I imagine the use of terminology access as following: > f.e. filling a listbox in an application, presenting codes and > accompanying descriptions so the user can choose his code. But this > does not seem possible with the currently terminologyaccess interface. > > But again, thanks for your reply, and if you, or someone else can > explain where I can find additional specs, or can give explanations I > am very grateful > > Bert > -- Rahil Qamar Ph.D. Student Medical Informatics Group Room LF1 Kilburn Building University of Manchester Work number: +44 (0) 161 275 0663 Email: qamarr at cs.manchester.ac.uk Website: http://www.rahilqamar.com/ _______________________________________________ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical at openehr.org http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
