Hiya Koray,

It sounds like we may be able to collaborate in the future, which is 
fabulous. I'll be in touch

Cheers

Juanita

Koray Atalag wrote:
> Hi Juanita and others,
>
> It would be a great research topic and I think one that is needed very 
> badly from openEHR community. If I manage to find an appropriate 
> research position, this would definitely fall within scope of my 
> research as I already have necessary experience and data in endoscopy as 
> explained in my thesis.  I have been  investigating this subject because 
> of a paper in progress which summarizes my thesis work and I want to 
> inform readers about other studies which claim Archetype bases two-level 
> modelling is superior to classical one in terms of maintainability, 
> interoperability and domain knowledge governance; preferably with 
> objective formal methods. Of course it is hard considering that this is 
> a new paradigm and tricky due to the nature of problem. What I saw is 
> this: formal methods are negligibly scarce and current data is mostly 
> coming from expert opinion. There is a very interesting whitepaper 
> (2004) which explains why single level modelling fails in development 
> and maintenance. It is not really very scientific(?) but you may find it 
> useful anyways:
>
> A Practical Implementation of a Two Level Archetype Based Clinical Model
> http://www.meridianhi.com/IDME_Whitepaper.htm
>
> One last thing about HL7: I read that paper by Ceusters & Smith; it is 
> interesting though but there is another paper as response from HL7 
> rounds and both seem to tell about facts from different perspectives. I 
> feel that HL7 is over-criticized here and that this would not increase 
> the value of this work for sure. I used v2.4 messages myself and I found 
> it very useful like many. Simply their move with v3 to become a content 
> standard apart from messaging which is then extended to be an EHR 
> standard is not an elegant approach.  Maybe we all criticize about this 
> aspect, but then it results in a general dislike about whole HL7. And 
> keep in mind that only time will show who will survive; think about 
> (annoying) existence of cockroaches appearing many million years before 
> elegant species in biologic evolution :D
>
> Best regards,
>
> -koray
>
> Juanita Fernando wrote:
>   
>> Hiya,
>> I'm thinking of doing some post doc work in this area later on this 
>> year. I thought you might find this reference useful too Koray:
>>
>> Smith B, Ceusters W. HL7 RIM: An incoherent standard. Studies in Health 
>> Technology and Informatics. 2006 August 2006(124):133-8.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Juanita
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> openEHR-technical mailing list
>> openEHR-technical at openehr.org
>> http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
>>
>>   
>>     
> _______________________________________________
> openEHR-technical mailing list
> openEHR-technical at openehr.org
> http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
>   

Reply via email to