Koray,

What metrics do you want to define?

Gerard


On Feb 11, 2008, at 10:40 AM, Koray Atalag wrote:

> Dear All,
>
> I started this thread to get some feedback for finding methods/metrics
> to test & validate maintainability and interoperability (of Archetype
> based two-level apps). And I got very nice ones; however for
> interoperability, apart from Gerard's interface numbers I did not get
> any and interestingly from a quick literature survey I got very  
> little.
> I mean there are some indirect approaches but not straightforward. My
> case is a little more easier:
>
> 1) There is an up and running clinical IS developed with single level
> methodology based on an internationally agreed terminology including
> relationships and structure (domain knowledge let's say)
> 2) There is a complete Archetype model of this terminology using  
> openEHR
> RM which can comfortably be considered as a domain ontology (it has  
> more
> than what is given in terminology; i.e. existences, cardinalities)
> 3) These two can be said to have the same domain knowledge; ie. one
> hardcoded and one two-level modelled.
>
> Now can you think about a method to evaluate the interoperability
> levels/score of two systems?
>
> Do we need a remote system for benchmarking (i.e. connect and see how
> they interoperate)?
>
> Sorry to bother....but if we can get this straight perhaps we can
> express comfortably that a two-level app beats a single level app 7x  
> in
> maintainability and 5x interoperability. Or beats 2x HL7 system in
> maintenance but is beaten 2x in interoperablity.  Perhaps I am being  
> too
> naive but it is worth trying.



-- <private> --
Gerard Freriks, MD
Huigsloterdijk 378
2158 LR Buitenkaag
The Netherlands

T: +31 252544896
M: +31 620347088
E:     gfrer at luna.nl


Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little  
temporary
Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. Benjamin Franklin 11 Nov  
1755





-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20080211/90210170/attachment.html>

Reply via email to