Bert Verhees wrote: > > But is has, in my opinion nothing to do with that. Maybe when the EQL > definition is ready to use (I don't see much of discussion about this > subject, but maybe the EQL discussion is a private discussion?), than > again a way to implement it must be found,a nd maybe this changes the API. > > But that is a normal process in software-development, it is called > innovation > > no, it is not a private discussion. EQL, now called AQL (archetype query language) will also have a draft specification soon on openEHR.org. Just a matter of time to put the documentation together....
- thomas * *
