Thomas Beale schreef: > Bert Verhees wrote: > >> But is has, in my opinion nothing to do with that. Maybe when the EQL >> definition is ready to use (I don't see much of discussion about this >> subject, but maybe the EQL discussion is a private discussion?), than >> again a way to implement it must be found,a nd maybe this changes the API. >> >> But that is a normal process in software-development, it is called >> innovation >> >> >> > no, it is not a private discussion. EQL, now called AQL (archetype query > language) will also have a draft specification soon on openEHR.org. Just > a matter of time to put the documentation together.... > Thanks, I am very interested. Will this be a part of a following version of OpenEhr? (this is good to know in the context of conformance)
Bert
