Tim Cook schreef: > I 'added to' the subject line because I was introducing a new subject. > > If you are offended then I am sorry but I think it's inappropriate to > have conversations drift off topic and keep the same subject line. It > makes the archives less useful. IMHO. > I remembered that I talked about the persistence-API exactly one year ago, I was working on it than, and ran against some problems, and came to the idea that we should work together to solve them, because we could get a unified solution. But the discussion slipped of to other subjects then which had no follow up, but the momentum of my discussion was lost, I never got an answer or an opportunity to discuss these problems further.
The situation looked a lot like this one. > You probably should have changed this one to: Hijacking :-) > You are right, and not only change it, but start a new one, because, it are also the messageID's which mess up. Doesn't matter for now Bert > Cheers, > > Tim > > > On Sat, 2008-01-05 at 11:22 +0100, Bert Verhees wrote: > >> And the last thing I want to say about this. >> >> You changed the subject of the discussion, I do not blame you (it is >> called hijacking of subject), but it says something. >> It says that you think that the discussion I was involved should change >> to another discussion >> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thread_hijacking >> >> Now, I go on with my work, thanks for your attention >> > >
