On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 12:42:56AM +0200, Mikael Nystr?m wrote: > > It shouldn't, of course, be excluded by default but should > > be excludable on demand. By, say, allowing regex matching > > for path definitions. > > To be excludable on demand is probably a good solution, but I still think > that there is a benefit if it is possible to see which version of the > archetype the query was written for. If it's excluded on demand in a particular query then the query is written to work on any version - quite by design. Of course, the version can be included in the SELECT list so that one may learn which version actually matched the query.
Karsten -- GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346
