On 15/12/2010 00:57, pablo pazos wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
>     ...
>
>
> You describe a very big picture and sounds logic, so we'll have:
>
>     * Level 1: archetypes (for model complete data sets about a
>       concept, general and specialized ones)
>     * Level 2: structural templates (for localized use of archetypes,
>       general and specialized templates)
>     * Level 3: define the use of the structural templates
>           o GUI Templates: define directives over a couple of
>             Structural Templates to create a graphic representations
>             of some archetyped data.
>           o Message Templates: define directives to structure
>             archetyped data into messages with some syntax (HL7 v2,
>             v3, 13606, CCR, CCD, CDA ...).
>

to do non-openEHR message syntaxes, it requires not just another 
'template' (in fact, not much be needed here), but a transformation from 
the operational template (OPT) form to the target form, e.g. CCR XSD or 
whatever.

>           o Report Templates: create reports with aggregated data and
>             graphic representations like charts. Can be used by GUI
>             Templates.
>           o Information Aggregation Templates: to define data
>             aggregation rules over a set of  archetyped data. Can be
>             used by GUI Templates, Report Templates, etc.
>           o Rule Templates: to define rules over a set of archetyped
>             data to check validity, consistency, etc, etc. Can be used
>             by Decision Support Modules, e.g. to check medication
>             reactions.
>           o ...
>

I am not sure what some of these would look like, but I suspect they 
will come into existence one day...

>
>
>         If the already present annotation mechanism in templates is
>         powerful enough (Do you think it is, Koray, Pablo and others?)
>
>
>
>     to be clear, do you mean the annotations documented in the ADL 1.5
>     draft document? I.e. the new annotations section?
>
>
>
> I have a couple ideas that can improve what we've done on the EHR-Gen 
> framework. If you want I can put them in the wiki.
*
* please do that

- thomas

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20101215/98dced08/attachment.html>

Reply via email to