Hi,
Apologies in advance if this is the incorrect email list for this topic, but I 
thought it was the most relevant.

I'm a member of OpenMRS and there we are discussion a way to have users share 
the concepts (a limited form of an archetype) created in their systems. This 
means that for a single concept you could have many concepts from different 
implementations. This could be because of language or because different words 
refer to the same concept. For example, Gender in the US might be Sex in 
another country and Sexo in spanish.

I would like to see if OpenEHR has solved this problem so that perhaps OpenMRS 
could begin to use archetypes.

Thanks

Joaquin



-----Original Message-----
From: openehr-technical-request at openehr.org 
[[email protected]]
Received: Monday, 01 Aug 2011, 18:27
To: openehr-technical at openehr.org [openehr-technical at openehr.org]
Subject: openEHR-technical Digest, Vol 61, Issue 1

Send openEHR-technical mailing list submissions to
        openehr-technical at openehr.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        openehr-technical-request at openehr.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
        openehr-technical-owner at openehr.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of openEHR-technical digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Multiple values in C_DV_ORDINAL constraints (Ian McNicoll)
   2. Re: Multiple values in C_DV_ORDINAL constraints (Thomas Beale)
   3. AUTO: Amnon Shabo is out of the office. (returning
      11/08/2011) (Amnon Shabo)
   4. Re: Multiple values in C_DV_ORDINAL constraints (Ian McNicoll)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2011 16:17:16 +0100
From: Ian McNicoll <[email protected]>
Subject: Multiple values in C_DV_ORDINAL constraints
To: For openEHR technical discussions
        <openehr-technical at chime.ucl.ac.uk>,    For openEHR clinical 
discussions
        <openehr-clinical at chime.ucl.ac.uk>
Message-ID:
        <CAG-n1KyO==CMadsWqE6D1OLoRXNqp4jhKm8rX0ANAqiEave-HQ at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

I have come across an interesting example of where we might want to
model an ordinal constraint where the values associated with each term
are not unique.

The example is the Waterlow Score

http://www.judy-waterlow.co.uk/downloads/Waterlow%20Score%20Card-front.pdf

If you look at the bottom-right corner "Major surgery / Trauma" you
will se that two terms have identical values.

Currently the openEHR Archetype Editor will not let me add duplicate
values with separate terms. It is not clear (at least to me) from the
specifications that this behaviour is correct.

Is this a CR for the Archetype Editor, a CR to the Ref Model, or a
clever alternative modelling suggestion to me?

Regards,

Ian
Dr Ian McNicoll
office +44 (0)1536 414 994
fax +44 (0)1536 516317
mobile +44 (0)775 209 7859
skype ianmcnicoll
ian.mcnicoll at oceaninformatics.com

Clinical Modelling Consultant,?Ocean Informatics, UK
openEHR Clinical Knowledge Editor 
www.openehr.org/knowledge<http://www.openehr.org/knowledge>
Honorary Senior Research Associate, CHIME, UCL
BCS Primary Health Care ?www.phcsg.org



------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 17:04:14 +0100
From: Thomas Beale <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Multiple values in C_DV_ORDINAL constraints
To: openehr-clinical at openehr.org,       Openehr-Technical
        <openehr-technical at openehr.org>
Message-ID: <4E36CE7E.8070707 at oceaninformatics.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

If we consider this an ordinal based model, in which numbers which have
multiple possible values, e.g. skin type: 1 is for tissue paper dry,
oedematous, etc - this would be modelling using terminological synonyms
for a notional term whose meaning was something like 'waterlow skin type
1'.

- thomas

On 01/08/2011 16:17, Ian McNicoll wrote:
> I have come across an interesting example of where we might want to
> model an ordinal constraint where the values associated with each term
> are not unique.
>
> The example is the Waterlow Score
>
> http://www.judy-waterlow.co.uk/downloads/Waterlow%20Score%20Card-front.pdf
>
> If you look at the bottom-right corner "Major surgery / Trauma" you
> will se that two terms have identical values.
>
> Currently the openEHR Archetype Editor will not let me add duplicate
> values with separate terms. It is not clear (at least to me) from the
> specifications that this behaviour is correct.
>
> Is this a CR for the Archetype Editor, a CR to the Ref Model, or a
> clever alternative modelling suggestion to me?
>
> Regards,
>
> Ian
> Dr Ian McNicoll
> office +44 (0)1536 414 994
> fax +44 (0)1536 516317
> mobile +44 (0)775 209 7859
> skype ianmcnicoll
> ian.mcnicoll at oceaninformatics.com
>
> Clinical Modelling Consultant, Ocean Informatics, UK
> openEHR Clinical Knowledge Editor 
> www.openehr.org/knowledge<http://www.openehr.org/knowledge>
> Honorary Senior Research Associate, CHIME, UCL
> BCS Primary Health Care  www.phcsg.org<http://www.phcsg.org>
>
> _______________________________________________
> openEHR-clinical mailing list
> openEHR-clinical at openehr.org
> http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical
>


--
Ocean Informatics        *Thomas Beale
Chief Technology Officer, Ocean Informatics
<http://www.oceaninformatics.com/>*

Chair Architectural Review Board, /open/EHR Foundation
<http://www.openehr.org/>
Honorary Research Fellow, University College London
<http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/>
Chartered IT Professional Fellow, BCS, British Computer Society
<http://www.bcs.org.uk/>
Health IT blog <http://www.wolandscat.net/>


*
*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/private/openehr-technical/attachments/20110801/0c1cc21c/attachment-0001.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ocean_full_small.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 5828 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : 
http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/private/openehr-technical/attachments/20110801/0c1cc21c/attachment-0001.jpg

------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2011 22:02:35 +0300
From: Amnon Shabo <[email protected]>
Subject: AUTO: Amnon Shabo is out of the office. (returning
        11/08/2011)
To: For openEHR technical discussions <openehr-technical at openehr.org>
Message-ID:
        <OF0735A590.46FDC452-ONC22578DF.00689BA4-C22578DF.00689BA5 at 
il.ibm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8


I am out of the office until 11/08/2011.

I have no access to IBM email during this time, therefore:
? For Hypergenes issues, please contact Ariel Farkash at arielf at il.ibm.com
? For Standards Issue, please contact Karen Witting at witting at us.ibm.com
or Rich Rogers at rrogers at us.ibm.com
? For any other urgent issue, please send a text message to my cell phone
at +972-54-4714070
Thanks, Amnon.


Note: This is an automated response to your message  "Multiple values in
C_DV_ORDINAL constraints" sent on 1/8/2011 18:17:16.

This is the only notification you will receive while this person is away.



------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2011 23:22:21 +0100
From: Ian McNicoll <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Multiple values in C_DV_ORDINAL constraints
To: For openEHR clinical discussions <openehr-clinical at openehr.org>
Cc: Openehr-Technical <openehr-technical at openehr.org>
Message-ID:
        <CAG-n1KzpNQDMJgZ9ZdTz_XBsd4-4NPGtvNGT00bBZzVoHdVVnw at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Hi Thomas,

I am not quite sure what you are saying here, though I agree, in essence,
the scoring system, like most others, is flattening a variety of patient
findings into a single term which also then carries a score. The problem is
that whilst the ordinal terms are unique, the related values are not and can
have duplicates.

So is this a valid ordinal ? ordinal constraint?

Ian

Dr Ian McNicoll
office +44 (0)1536 414 994
fax +44 (0)1536 516317
mobile +44 (0)775 209 7859
skype ianmcnicoll
ian.mcnicoll at oceaninformatics.com

Clinical Modelling Consultant, Ocean Informatics, UK
openEHR Clinical Knowledge Editor 
www.openehr.org/knowledge<http://www.openehr.org/knowledge>
Honorary Senior Research Associate, CHIME, UCL
BCS Primary Health Care  www.phcsg.org<http://www.phcsg.org>



On 1 August 2011 17:04, Thomas Beale <thomas.beale at 
oceaninformatics.com>wrote:

>  If we consider this an ordinal based model, in which numbers which have
> multiple possible values, e.g. skin type: 1 is for tissue paper dry,
> oedematous, etc - this would be modelling using terminological synonyms for
> a notional term whose meaning was something like 'waterlow skin type 1'.
>
> - thomas
>
>
> On 01/08/2011 16:17, Ian McNicoll wrote:
>
> I have come across an interesting example of where we might want to
> model an ordinal constraint where the values associated with each term
> are not unique.
>
> The example is the Waterlow Score
> http://www.judy-waterlow.co.uk/downloads/Waterlow%20Score%20Card-front.pdf
>
> If you look at the bottom-right corner "Major surgery / Trauma" you
> will se that two terms have identical values.
>
> Currently the openEHR Archetype Editor will not let me add duplicate
> values with separate terms. It is not clear (at least to me) from the
> specifications that this behaviour is correct.
>
> Is this a CR for the Archetype Editor, a CR to the Ref Model, or a
> clever alternative modelling suggestion to me?
>
> Regards,
>
> Ian
> Dr Ian McNicoll
> office +44 (0)1536 414 994
> fax +44 (0)1536 516317
> mobile +44 (0)775 209 7859
> skype ianmcnicollian.mcnicoll at oceaninformatics.com
>
> Clinical Modelling Consultant, Ocean Informatics, UK
> openEHR Clinical Knowledge Editor 
> www.openehr.org/knowledge<http://www.openehr.org/knowledge>
> Honorary Senior Research Associate, CHIME, UCL
> BCS Primary Health Care  www.phcsg.org<http://www.phcsg.org>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> openEHR-clinical mailing list
> openEHR-clinical at 
> openehr.orghttp://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical
>
>
>
> --
>   [image: Ocean Informatics]  *Thomas Beale
> Chief Technology Officer, Ocean Informatics<http://www.oceaninformatics.com/>
> *
>
> Chair Architectural Review Board, *open*EHR 
> Foundation<http://www.openehr.org/>
> Honorary Research Fellow, University College 
> London<http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/>
> Chartered IT Professional Fellow, BCS, British Computer 
> Society<http://www.bcs.org.uk/>
> Health IT blog <http://www.wolandscat.net/>
> *
> *
>
> _______________________________________________
> openEHR-clinical mailing list
> openEHR-clinical at openehr.org
> http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/private/openehr-technical/attachments/20110801/06c6f646/attachment.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 5828 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : 
http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/private/openehr-technical/attachments/20110801/06c6f646/attachment.jpe

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
openEHR-technical mailing list
openEHR-technical at openehr.org
http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical


End of openEHR-technical Digest, Vol 61, Issue 1
************************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20110802/2dee9889/attachment.html>

Reply via email to