On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 16:54, Sam Heard <sam.heard at oceaninformatics.com> wrote: > Hi Tom > > It is normal practice with CC to include clarifications and the whole > structure of the license is designed to do this. > > Let's stay with the issue of how we stop someone copyrighting and charging > for a specialised archetype? Or a template that is fundamental to health > care (like an antenatal visit)?
Maybe that isn't such a bad thing. They are only roping themselves into their own corner.
