Indeed. We were very wary of this CDA style duplication, which from my point of view is pretty ambiguous if not downright problematic <http://wolandscat.net/2012/01/28/the-cda-dual-content-conundrum/>.
However, unless we develop some new formal relationship between the text and the structured part for orders and prescriptions - something which to do properly I think is probably a PhD thesis level of work - then for now we have to accept this bit of 'duplication' and understand it for what it is. A lot of work has been done in the UK in this area, and it may be that there is an answer already available - if anyone has information on it, would be useful to share. - thomas On 29/10/2013 11:48, Diego Bosc? wrote: > The thing is that this reminds me to the CDA narrative part, which is > the only "required" part. If I remember correctly, the only part that > can be assumed right is the narrative. But as openEHR gives a lot of > weight to the structured part, then it could be other way around. > > And by the way, I also agree that "none" is a correct answer :) > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20131029/cdc22f41/attachment.html>
