On 29/10/2013 16:28, Dr Ed Hammond, Ph.D. wrote: > > As a point of interest, the "required" narrative section in CCD was an > interim step because we (US) still have a number of sites that cannot > accommodate structured data. In my opinion it does not imply correctness. >
Ed, I suggested some rules in my blog post for deal with this very ubiquitous reality... I wonder if you have any feel for whether the text/structured 'equivalence' idea will remain in a future CDA - going by Grahame's blog <http://www.healthintersections.com.au/?p=1699>, it appears CDA will turn into FHIR, i.e. a completely different format? If it is retained, there is an opportunity to establish better rules for this. I can imagine upgrading openEHR to use such rules as well. - thomas -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20131029/5e892a09/attachment.html>
