On 09-09-15 09:55, Thomas Beale wrote:
Bert,
my comments relate to software only, contributed by companies and
other organisations at their own development expense.
It has nothing to do with specifications, nor specification-related
computational artefacts (grammars, XSDs, and the like). These are all
issued by the foundation, copyrighted to the foundation and will
always be free to use under all circumstances, as has always been the
case for 15 years. This will never change.
Good to be crystal clear about this, with all the FUDders waiting for
their chances.
Remember, they talk with not so well informed people (govt. bureaucrats,
for example) regarding licensing issues.
;-)
There are three kind of deliverables coming from OpenEHR (and Ocean)
1) The specs (NOT DERIVABLE)
2) The CKM archetypes (archetypes can be seen as software, (say some))
(SHARE ALIKE)
3) What anyone recognizes as software (For Ocean to decide)
For me only the first part is important, but others find part 2 and/or 3
also very important, for good reasons.
What Ocean does should IMHO be anyway outside the scope of this discussion.
I hope they are going to charge lots of money for their software, the
more the better.
Others are happy to fill the market-gap.
Bert
_______________________________________________
openEHR-technical mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
