" I would focus on intra hospital longitudinal lists since it is very
difficult to reach agreement in the enterprise."

I agree. These decisions are partly technical but largely down to the
level of commitment/ consensus you can get in your clinical community
to jointly curate these lists over time. The value of longitudinal
persistence only accrues if everyone has commitment to the on-going
curation process and is prepared to work within a common governance
framework, rights and responsibilities.

http://www.bcs.org/content/conWebDoc/17923

Ian
Dr Ian McNicoll
mobile +44 (0)775 209 7859
office +44 (0)1536 414994
skype: ianmcnicoll
email: [email protected]
twitter: @ianmcnicoll

Co-Chair, openEHR Foundation [email protected]
Director, freshEHR Clinical Informatics Ltd.
Director, HANDIHealth CIC
Hon. Senior Research Associate, CHIME, UCL


On 3 April 2016 at 09:07, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
> Good info and the criteria makes sense.
>
>
> I would use episodic for things like hospitalization and treatments that are
> not a knee time thing (event), maybe with help of folders. Also I would
> focus on intra hospital longitudinal lists since it is very difficult to
> reach agreement in the enterprise. And when that time comes, I would just
> implement a new set of rules for the enterprise :)
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> Sent from my LG Mobile
>
> ------ Original message------
>
> From: Ian McNicoll
>
> Date: Sat, Apr 2, 2016 15:50
>
> To: For openEHR technical discussions;
>
> Subject:Re: Composition commit and change types
>
> Hi Pablo,When I am advising implementers on this, I use the following
> categories ...## Composition Commit StylesDepending on the clinical
> requirement, 3 styles of commit strategy aresuggested.1. **’Event’**e.g
> Nursing observations, clinical encounters, reports.Each time the composition
> is committed, create a new instance via a POST.Generally only do a PUT if an
> error needs to be corrected2. **’Episodic’**Create a new composition via
> POST for each Period of Care i.e anadmission. If it needs to updated, use a
> PUT to modify i.e Eachpatient has a single instance per Period of Care.3.
> **’Longitudinal’**Create a new composition via POST for each patient. If it
> needs toupdated use a PUT to modify i.e. each patient has only a
> singleinstance over their lifetime. This will be unusual in a hospitalrecord
> where there is generally limited ability to curate the patientrecord in this
> way.So your persistence uses cases are either 2/3. Currently to
> manageEpisodic persistence, you need ot set the composition category
> toevent, as the RM currently forces a 'persistent' composition to
> becontextless i.e. the context attribute is 0...0. This will change inan
> upcoming RM revision.The decision about when/where to maintain
> persistent/curated lists isone which will vary between implementations. I
> would generally expectMedication lists, Allergies and some documents such as
> Resuscitationpreferences to be maintained as single, persistent instances.
> AlthoughProblems and Procedures should also probably be maintained that
> way,there are valid situations where departmental problem lists e.g
> Renalmedicine have validity.There are strong arguments, at least in UK
> practice, for maintaining asingle cross-organisation outpatient/community
> medication record buteach inpatient medication list should be separately
> maintianed foreach instiution/episode of care.IanDr Ian McNicollmobile +44
> (0)775 209 7859office +44 (0)1536 414994skype: ianmcnicollemail:
> [email protected]: @ianmcnicollCo-Chair, openEHR Foundation
> [email protected], freshEHR Clinical Informatics
> Ltd.Director, HANDIHealth CICHon. Senior Research Associate, CHIME, UCLOn 2
> April 2016 at 06:59, [email protected]  wrote:> Hi all, I'm testing
> some cases in the EHRServer and I want to confirn some> grey areas.>>> If
> the EHR receives a commit of a persistent composition and the change type>
> is creation, should the EHR create a new composition?>>> i.e. I don't see an
> EHR having two different medication lists, is that> possible?>>> I guess
> persistent compos can only be created one time per archetype (one>
> medication list, one problem list, one vaccination list, etc. per patient),>
> and after the creation, all commits should be modification. Does this make>
> any sense?>>> If this is OK, to avoid errors from client applications, I
> would return an> error when a creation is committed for a persistent compo
> archetype that> already has a conpo instance.>>> And about the first commit.
> Should, lets say, the medication list be created> when the first medication
> is recorded or can it be created empty? What do> other implementations out
> there do?>>> Thanks a lot!>>>
> _______________________________________________> openEHR-technical mailing
> list> [email protected]>
> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org_______________________________________________openEHR-technical
> mailing
> [email protected]http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org

_______________________________________________
openEHR-technical mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org

Reply via email to