On 16-02-18 12:41, Thomas Beale wrote:
in openEHR terms...
On 16/02/2018 05:38, GF wrote:
Hi all,
In my opinion there are several types of ‘patterns’:
- Specific Local Templates/patterns used in a defined community for
specific purposes
specialisations of any archetype for local usage.
I don think you should ever create an archetype in the idea that it is a
local archetype. I think you can never guarantee that. Archetypes are a
model of thinking, a semantic model, instead of a technical model, like
Codd-normalization.
So in an other situation there will also be the need to express the same
way of thinking in an archetype, but they will probably structure it
different.
That is something were we should find a way to avoid that.
- Specific Clinical Models/patterns for things like: the
documentation of lab-test forms/panels, collections of meta-data for
documentation of specific observations/test for abdominal complaints,
etc.
COMPOSITION archetypes, probably some SECTION archetypes
Sections are, I think, a problem, they are part of the path, so they
change query-paths and can make data invisible, because maybe no one
thought of a section when searching in a database.
I don't know if AQL has a wild-card to pass sections without paying
attention to them. I think that is necessary.
Bert
_______________________________________________
openEHR-technical mailing list
openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
