It was my own idea, I wrote they will not say that out loud. (It was a joke) Bert
Op za 17 feb. 2018 20:18 schreef Thomas Beale <[email protected]>: > > > On 16/02/2018 18:30, A Verhees wrote: > > > > But I have one remark about your point 4, about SNOMED. Just some > > thinking. > > > > I think I understand the original purpose why it is designed. Encoding > > every clinical term and arranging them in graphs, and also offer > > translations. > > > > But they did not stop there, they defined a query language and a data > > storage language, both capable of not only handling terms, but also > > handling graph-based hierarchies and handling quantities. > > Bert, can you point to the specifications for this - I was unaware that > SNOMED had re-invented the EHR... > > > > > The purpose still can be to offer an international usable storage, but > > why then the query language? I think they want to offer a base for an > > EHR, but they don't say that loud, so they do not scare away vendors. > > > > But again, it does not keep me from my sleep, it is better for me to > > concentrate on what is feasible now and have fun with that. > > > > Best regards > > Bert > > > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-technical mailing list > [email protected] > > http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org >
_______________________________________________ openEHR-technical mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
