On 19/02/2018 10:47, Pablo Pazos wrote:
IMO annotating templates with UI info is not a good idea. A layered approach is much cleaner and scalable, i.e. to define a new artifact on top of current templates / archetypes / RM (these are also examples of layered design).

here, 'templates' means pure data templates, i.e. pure RM or other data constructs, e.g. PROC (Task Planning) or CDS etc.


Under this approach, if we have UITemplates on top of openEHR Templates, when we generate Operational UITemplates, that will contain UI + structure (template and archetype constraints) + RM references. This would be the final element to be used to feed software. but the underlying models are all separated and have a specific responsibility.

So what I am proposing is what you are calling UITemplates (one could also think of DOCTemplates and MSGTemplates) - they are openEHR templates, as in being ADL/AOM artefacts, but based on a model of UI/presentation primitives that enables RM and other data elements to be embedded.


If we go ahead, we can add another level for workflow, defining an order and conditions under which each "screen" should be displayed, like a WFTemplate, having an Operational WFTemplate that will include all WF + GUI + structure + RM references.

I think this can make sense as either another model layer, or maybe better as specific annotations that use FOPL-like or rule statements to define work flow, e.g.

when /data/path1/value = "coded" then display (/ui/path5)

where /data/path1 is an archetype path of the kind we are used to, pointing to some DV_TEXT element and /ui/path5 is a path through the UI template that points to a sub-form, presumably one that knows how to ask for a coded text.

If we separate out screen workflow from screen logical layout, then we can re-use the latter with different workflows, reprocess it into a PDF or other document structure and so on.


We can continue adding layers :)

exactly right.

- thomas

_______________________________________________
openEHR-technical mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org

Reply via email to