Hi, There is NO need for an other RM.
Templates (imo) describe an interface. Templates for an interface used for display only need annotations in the appropriate nodes of the Display Archetype Gerard Freriks +31 620347088 [email protected] Kattensingel 20 2801 CA Gouda the Netherlands > On 19 Feb 2018, at 10:29, Bert Verhees <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 19-02-18 10:21, Diego Boscá wrote: >> Personally I would prefer if no visualization attributes ended up in the EHR >> RM, but I'm fine if we want to create an additional RM to handle >> visualization (and we create templates of that model that point to the EHR >> model) > > I agree on this! > > (again sloppy English in my previous message, this time changing the meaning, > I changed the quote below, I am awake now, will not happen again, excuse me) > >> >> 2018-02-19 10:15 GMT+01:00 Bert Verhees <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>>: >> On 18-02-18 23:09, GF wrote: >> Is it an idea to annotate nodes with instructions for display. >> >> Personally I think having special templates/archetypes for display is >> better. Templates are created per purpose, and mixing purposes in a single >> template does not seem good idea to me > > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-technical mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
_______________________________________________ openEHR-technical mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
