On 19-02-18 10:21, Diego Boscá wrote:
Personally I would prefer if no visualization attributes ended up in
the EHR RM, but I'm fine if we want to create an additional RM to
handle visualization (and we create templates of that model that point
to the EHR model)
I agree on this!
(again sloppy English in my previous message, this time changing the
meaning, I changed the quote below, I am awake now, will not happen
again, excuse me)
2018-02-19 10:15 GMT+01:00 Bert Verhees <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>:
On 18-02-18 23:09, GF wrote:
Is it an idea to annotate nodes with instructions for display.
Personally I think having special templates/archetypes for display
is better. Templates are create*d* per purpose, and mixing
purposes in a single template does *no**t* seem good idea to me
_______________________________________________
openEHR-technical mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
