> > So splitting up the RM instead of making it larger would be my idea. The > first is not easy to do, but the second is, and helps us avoiding further > problems and avoiding creating unnecessary large libraries. > > > We are not intending to make the RM any larger, not sure why you think we > are. >
In your first message about this proposal was something that made me think you were about to enlarge the RM and also to have all in a large pile of classes. I quote: "Doing the above requires adding some new classes to the RM, or a Presentation Model part of openEHR." I think you changed your mind now, so that is not important. Bert
_______________________________________________ openEHR-technical mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
