I didn't change my mind, I was just not precise when I said that ;)
- t
On 20/02/2018 23:29, A Verhees wrote:
So splitting up the RM instead of making it larger would be my
idea. The first is not easy to do, but the second is, and helps
us avoiding further problems and avoiding creating unnecessary
large libraries.
We are not intending to make the RM any larger, not sure why you
think we are.
In your first message about this proposal was something that made me
think you were about to enlarge the RM and also to have all in a large
pile of classes.
I quote: "Doing the above requires adding some new classes to the RM,
or a Presentation Model part of openEHR."
I think you changed your mind now, so that is not important.
_______________________________________________
openEHR-technical mailing list
openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
