Sorry - the reason is that O2% is also described as FIO2 which is directly mathematically equivalent.
FiO₂ Proportion Optional Fraction of oxygen in inspired air. Comment: For example: '0.28'. Unitary Numerator: 0.0..1.0 Percent O₂ Proportion Optional Percentage of oxygen in inspired air. Comment: For example: '24 %' Percent Numerator: 0.0..100.0 Dr Ian McNicoll mobile +44 (0)775 209 7859 office +44 (0)1536 414994 skype: ianmcnicoll email: i...@freshehr.com twitter: @ianmcnicoll Co-Chair, openEHR Foundation ian.mcnic...@openehr.org Director, freshEHR Clinical Informatics Ltd. Director, HANDIHealth CIC Hon. Senior Research Associate, CHIME, UCL On Mon, 14 Jan 2019 at 12:08, Bakke, Silje Ljosland < silje.ljosland.ba...@nasjonalikt.no> wrote: > Anyone…? 😊 > > > > Regards, > > *Silje* > > > > *From:* openEHR-technical <openehr-technical-boun...@lists.openehr.org> *On > Behalf Of *Bakke, Silje Ljosland > *Sent:* Tuesday, January 8, 2019 2:53 PM > *To:* For openEHR technical discussions < > openehr-technical@lists.openehr.org> > *Subject:* RE: DV_PROPORTION vs DV_QUANTITY for % > > > > I still don’t understand if we have a conclusion. And I don’t understand > why proportion is the correct data type for O2 levels but not for alcohol > levels. > > > > Regards, > > *Silje* > > > > *From:* openEHR-technical <openehr-technical-boun...@lists.openehr.org> *On > Behalf Of *Ian McNicoll > *Sent:* Monday, January 7, 2019 7:13 PM > *To:* For openEHR technical discussions < > openehr-technical@lists.openehr.org> > *Subject:* Re: DV_PROPORTION vs DV_QUANTITY for % > > > > Simple answer - loads of real data - pulse_oximetry and Oxygen levels will > have been recorded hundreds of thousands if not millions of times in > patient data - and Proportion *is* the correct datatype for O2 levels. > > Ian > > Dr Ian McNicoll > mobile +44 (0)775 209 7859 > office +44 (0)1536 414994 > skype: ianmcnicoll > email: i...@freshehr.com > twitter: @ianmcnicoll > > > > Co-Chair, openEHR Foundation ian.mcnic...@openehr.org > > Director, freshEHR Clinical Informatics Ltd. > Director, HANDIHealth CIC > Hon. Senior Research Associate, CHIME, UCL > > > > > > On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 at 17:56, Thomas Beale <thomas.be...@openehr.org> > wrote: > > one thing to note: DV_PROPORTION is a more complex data structure. I > would be tempted to try to determine what use has been made of this > archetype so far - i.e. in creating real data. If no real data has been > created, then it could in theory be changed. > > - thomas > > On 07/01/2019 12:11, Ian McNicoll wrote: > > Hi Silje, > > > > As you say, I think this a case of emerging clarity (or less fog of > > confusion!!) as the various use-cases emerge. As the primary author of > > both these archetypes, in retrospect I would probably keep > > inspired_oxygen as DV_PROPORTION and change pulse_oximetry to > > DV_QUANTITY but!!! I do not see any good argument for changing these > > now. We have to expect some degree of inconsistency, and live with it, > > to avoid unnecessary breaking changes. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-technical mailing list > openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org > > http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org > > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-technical mailing list > openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org > > http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org >
_______________________________________________ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
