On Mon, 2011-05-09 at 22:26 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: > From: Khem Raj <[email protected]> > > Appending to BBPATH gives a definite order to BBLAYERS which > means paths are preferred in order from left to right. > > [sgw: merged in comment] > Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <[email protected]> > --- > meta/conf/layer.conf | 10 +++++++++- > 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/meta/conf/layer.conf b/meta/conf/layer.conf > index 3f63c7d..10a6948 100644 > --- a/meta/conf/layer.conf > +++ b/meta/conf/layer.conf > @@ -2,7 +2,15 @@ BBPATH ?= "" > # We have a conf and classes directory, add to BBPATH > BBPATH .= ":${LAYERDIR}" > # We have a packages directory, add to BBFILES > -BBFILES += "${LAYERDIR}/packages/*/*.bb ${LAYERDIR}/recipes-*/*/*.bb" > +# packages is still there because metadata_scm.bbclass still uses > +# it to deduce the repo directory and thats the reason to prepend > +# to BBFILES here because this class uses the first entry in > +# BBFILES to calculate the scm base. > +# since the order of BBFLILES is not that important its acted upon > +# using BBFILES_PRIORITY we are ok to keep the oe-core BBFILES dir > +# at top
Er, how about we actually fix metadata_scm.bbclass instead of making the world more complicated and fragile? :) I suspect metadata_scm could use the COREBASE variable and be much nicer code... Cheers, Richard _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
