On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 1:54 AM, Richard Purdie <[email protected]> wrote: > Er, how about we actually fix metadata_scm.bbclass instead of making the > world more complicated and fragile? :) > > I suspect metadata_scm could use the COREBASE variable and be much nicer > code...
I'd really like to see it gather information about the current state of all layers which are scm working copies and summarize this in the build summary, rather than grabbing one specific bit of information, personally. -- Christopher Larson clarson at kergoth dot com Founder - BitBake, OpenEmbedded, OpenZaurus Maintainer - Tslib Senior Software Engineer, Mentor Graphics _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
