On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 10:56 -0700, Chris Larson wrote: > On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 1:54 AM, Richard Purdie > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Er, how about we actually fix metadata_scm.bbclass instead of making the > > world more complicated and fragile? :) > > > > I suspect metadata_scm could use the COREBASE variable and be much nicer > > code... > > I'd really like to see it gather information about the current state > of all layers which are scm working copies and summarize this in the > build summary, rather than grabbing one specific bit of information, > personally.
I'd also agree with this and have said as much somewhere (layer tooling discussions?) but I'll take the COREBASE change short term. Cheers, Richard _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
