On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 1:54 AM, Richard Purdie <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 2011-05-09 at 22:26 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: >> From: Khem Raj <[email protected]> >> >> Appending to BBPATH gives a definite order to BBLAYERS which >> means paths are preferred in order from left to right. >> >> [sgw: merged in comment] >> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <[email protected]> >> Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <[email protected]> >> --- >> meta/conf/layer.conf | 10 +++++++++- >> 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/meta/conf/layer.conf b/meta/conf/layer.conf >> index 3f63c7d..10a6948 100644 >> --- a/meta/conf/layer.conf >> +++ b/meta/conf/layer.conf >> @@ -2,7 +2,15 @@ BBPATH ?= "" >> # We have a conf and classes directory, add to BBPATH >> BBPATH .= ":${LAYERDIR}" >> # We have a packages directory, add to BBFILES >> -BBFILES += "${LAYERDIR}/packages/*/*.bb ${LAYERDIR}/recipes-*/*/*.bb" >> +# packages is still there because metadata_scm.bbclass still uses >> +# it to deduce the repo directory and thats the reason to prepend >> +# to BBFILES here because this class uses the first entry in >> +# BBFILES to calculate the scm base. >> +# since the order of BBFLILES is not that important its acted upon >> +# using BBFILES_PRIORITY we are ok to keep the oe-core BBFILES dir >> +# at top > > Er, how about we actually fix metadata_scm.bbclass instead of making the > world more complicated and fragile? :) > > I suspect metadata_scm could use the COREBASE variable and be much nicer > code... > yes OK let me see
> Cheers, > > Richard > > > _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
