On Thu, 2020-08-27 at 12:59 +0200, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > It was previously skipped as it was expecting plain connman > to not be in the image, and for core-image-sato connman is always > there. > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <[email protected]> > --- > meta/lib/oeqa/runtime/cases/multilib.py | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/meta/lib/oeqa/runtime/cases/multilib.py > b/meta/lib/oeqa/runtime/cases/multilib.py > index 56aed62eea..0d1b9ae2c9 100644 > --- a/meta/lib/oeqa/runtime/cases/multilib.py > +++ b/meta/lib/oeqa/runtime/cases/multilib.py > @@ -42,6 +42,6 @@ class MultilibTest(OERuntimeTestCase): > self.archtest("/lib64/libc.so.6", "ELF64") > > @OETestDepends(['multilib.MultilibTest.test_check_multilib_libc' > ]) > - @OEHasPackage(['lib32-connman', '!connman']) > + @OEHasPackage(['lib32-connman']) > def test_file_connman(self): > self.archtest("/usr/sbin/connmand", "ELF32")
Hmm. I think this test is only meant to trigger in a lib32-core-image- sato where lib32-connman would be present and connman would not? The test name could certainly be clearer as its not a generic connman test... Cheers, Richard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#141897): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/141897 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/76448656/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
