On Thu, 27 Aug 2020 at 13:06, Richard Purdie < [email protected]> wrote:
> Hmm. I think this test is only meant to trigger in a lib32-core-image- > sato where lib32-connman would be present and connman would not? > > The test name could certainly be clearer as its not a generic connman > test... > There is no lib32-core-image-sato anywhere in config.json - and I think RPM_PREFER_ELF_ARCH in existing tests should ensure that 32 bit connman package takes precedence. Also note that those same tests install lib32-connman, which can only be for the purpose of the test: http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/yocto-autobuilder-helper/tree/config.json#n495
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#141899): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/141899 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/76448656/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
