On Thu, 2020-08-27 at 13:25 +0200, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > On Thu, 27 Aug 2020 at 13:06, Richard Purdie > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hmm. I think this test is only meant to trigger in a lib32-core-image- > > sato where lib32-connman would be present and connman would not? > > > > The test name could certainly be clearer as its not a generic connman > > test... > > There is no lib32-core-image-sato anywhere in config.json - and I think > RPM_PREFER_ELF_ARCH in existing tests should ensure that 32 bit connman > package takes precedence. > > Also note that those same tests install lib32-connman, which can only be for > the purpose of the test: > http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/yocto-autobuilder-helper/tree/config.json#n495
Right, those are the tests I was thinking this test is related to. It looks like its only those tests that enable this TEST_SUITE so your patch is probably correct. Its a shame this test suite is so tied to the configuration in ab-helper though. Not sure how we could improve that... Cheers, Richard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#141902): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/141902 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/76448656/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
