On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 2:36 PM Alexander Kanavin <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, 27 Aug 2020 at 23:31, Khem Raj <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 4:00 AM Alexander Kanavin >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > It is difficult and error-prone to ensure binutils gets >> > installed into target images where this test may run; >> > on the other hand readelf is always present on the >> > host, as it is a part of HOSTTOOLS. >> > >> >> this would mean that we are relying on build host provided binutils to >> be compiled with all bfd support >> since now we also have aarch64 build hosts it spreads he risk a bit >> more. maybe we can >> ignore this test if target does not have binutils installed or depend >> on binutils-native for providing readelf > > > The test needs to be explicitly enabled, and requires a very specific build > configuration (see config.json from the AB); it is unlikely someone will > stumble upon it randomly. >
that makes it less frequent but the logic problem still remains isn't it. > Alex
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#141924): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/141924 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/76448654/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
