On 15 Jan 2024, at 13:49, Alexander Kanavin <[email protected]> wrote: >> We could #if 0 out every test that failed and rejoice in our 100% pass test >> cases but that would be a terrible idea, so why is this different? > > This is what we already do for intermittently failing ptests all over > the stack. Rejoice!
Hopefully we assess the test and determine if the odds are good that it is in fact timing related before doing this! > This issue is reported upstream, and the link is in the patch. Yes, > given sufficient time one can become an expert in intricacies of glib, > openssl, and their interaction, and then develop a real fix all by > themselves, but I think a more fair expectation is exactly what Khem > is doing: report upstream, add a reasonable workaround, follow up > upstream requests in the reported ticket. This is a configuration that upstream doesn’t support and we don’t enable by default, so I’m leaning towards Khem carries the patch alongside the bbappend to turn on the openssl backend in the first place. Ross
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#193679): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/193679 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/103626740/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
