On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 6:04 AM Ross Burton <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 15 Jan 2024, at 13:49, Alexander Kanavin <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> We could #if 0 out every test that failed and rejoice in our 100% pass > test cases but that would be a terrible idea, so why is this different? > > > > This is what we already do for intermittently failing ptests all over > > the stack. Rejoice! > > Hopefully we assess the test and determine if the odds are good that it is > in fact timing related before doing this! > > > This issue is reported upstream, and the link is in the patch. Yes, > > given sufficient time one can become an expert in intricacies of glib, > > openssl, and their interaction, and then develop a real fix all by > > themselves, but I think a more fair expectation is exactly what Khem > > is doing: report upstream, add a reasonable workaround, follow up > > upstream requests in the reported ticket. > > This is a configuration that upstream doesn’t support and we don’t enable > by default, so I’m leaning towards Khem carries the patch alongside the > bbappend to turn on the openssl backend in the first place. Where does it say it does not support? On the contrary there are patches in this area sent recently Yes I can carry all of changes we need locally that’s not an issue we are already carrying many of them they just make it harder to contribute back to project as these pile up > > Ross
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#193688): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/193688 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/103626740/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
