2013/8/22 Richard Purdie <richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org>: > We've slowly been shaking out the definition of OE-Core and as part of > that we removed web and web-gtk which were the only browsers in there > and were admittedly a bit limited/broken. > > There is no doubt that web technology has an increasingly important role > in the future and in embedded devices (e.g. kiosk type devices, digital > signs and so on). > > With that in mind, I think some kind of HTML support in OE-Core is > important going forward. Equally, I dislike having things there which we > cannot test. I know some people have looked into this and it appears > midori is the best option for something with a small number of > additional dependencies. I therefore currently think this is something > we should make a decision to include since it gives us significantly > better coverage of things like webkit which are a already in the core > yet totally untested at present. > > I'm open to opinions, equally we do need to make a decision on this soon > since we're nearly at the feature freeze point. Thoughts?
Hi, just some thoughts: Qt provides an example application that uses webkit called "fancybrowser" This demo it is located at the package qt4-examples (/usr/bin/qt4/examples/webkit/fancybrowser/ in the target sysroot). -- Regards Samuel _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core