On Thu, 2013-08-22 at 16:24 +0200, Samuel Stirtzel wrote: > 2013/8/22 Richard Purdie <[email protected]>: > > We've slowly been shaking out the definition of OE-Core and as part of > > that we removed web and web-gtk which were the only browsers in there > > and were admittedly a bit limited/broken. > > > > There is no doubt that web technology has an increasingly important role > > in the future and in embedded devices (e.g. kiosk type devices, digital > > signs and so on). > > > > With that in mind, I think some kind of HTML support in OE-Core is > > important going forward. Equally, I dislike having things there which we > > cannot test. I know some people have looked into this and it appears > > midori is the best option for something with a small number of > > additional dependencies. I therefore currently think this is something > > we should make a decision to include since it gives us significantly > > better coverage of things like webkit which are a already in the core > > yet totally untested at present. > > > > I'm open to opinions, equally we do need to make a decision on this soon > > since we're nearly at the feature freeze point. Thoughts? > > > Hi, > > just some thoughts: Qt provides an example application that uses > webkit called "fancybrowser" > This demo it is located at the package qt4-examples > (/usr/bin/qt4/examples/webkit/fancybrowser/ in the target sysroot).
The webkit with qt is a bit different from the standalone webkit and would just test the qt version. Certainly something to think about but I'm not sure its quite what we need... Cheers, Richard _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
